Self-Improvement and Interesting Knowledge

Reality Fusion, And The Hidden World Behind the Routine Self

This article challenges you to undertake a quiet but profound confrontation with the nature of your own perception. It hints at a world behind the familiar one, a world that most people sense only in passing but rarely dare to explore. Within, you will encounter ideas that challenge the boundaries of routine awareness and question the foundations of what you may believe to be real. The journey is not presented as a simple escape from everyday life but as a deeper inquiry into the forces that shape identity, perception, and the structure of reality itself. There are suggestions of vastness, of hidden layers, of cracks in the ordinary world that reveal something far larger than the senses usually allow. You are invited to step toward this threshold, to consider what lies beyond, and to discover why such exploration may be far more important than you ever imagined.

When you think of identity diffusionA psychological state where clear boundaries of personal selfhood become porous or unstructured., most often you are most likely thinking about politics or some kind of powerful theology, but as we shall discover, this particular concept is something that affects our entire life, and it is quite simply the part of us, that little tiny gear within our psyche, that is responsible for our entire reality.

Let us begin by defining identity diffusion.

Identity fusion is a psychological state in which a person’s sense of self becomes tightly welded to a group, ideology, or worldview. In this fused state, the boundary between “I” and “we” dissolves, and the individual experiences the group’s beliefs, goals, and threats as their own personal reality.

Identity Fusion and the Shape of Everyday Reality

Identity fusion is not an exotic psychological condition reserved for zealots or fanatics. It is the quiet engine that drives the behavior of almost every person you know, including you. It is the moment when the self merges with a group or belief so completely that the boundary between personal identity and collective identity dissolves. Once this happens, the group is no longer something you belong to. It becomes something you are.

You can see this most clearly in the world of sports. Watch a devoted fan during a championship game and you will witness identity fusionThe deep structural merging of personal ego with external collective identities. in its purest form. They are not sitting on a couch. They are on the field. They are running the play. They are taking the hit. When their team loses, they feel a physical ache in their chest as if someone has punched them. Some will cry. Some will rage. Some will overturn cars and set fire to dumpsters as if the universe has committed a personal insult. They are spectators in reality but participants in identity. The team is not a team. It is an extension of their own body.

This same mechanism operates in politics. A person who fuses with a political party does not simply support its ideas. They embody them. Any criticism of the party feels like an attack on their own character. Any challenge to its worldview feels like a threat to their safety. They defend the party with the same instinct that a parent uses to protect a child. They cannot separate themselves from the collective because the collective has become the architecture of their identity.

Theology offers another example. When belief becomes fused with the self, faith is no longer a perspective. It is a personal essence. Questioning doctrine becomes indistinguishable from questioning the believer’s existence. The sacred merges with the self… and the self becomes sacred!

This fusion is possible because reality begins with perceptionThe sensory filtering process conditioned by cultural instruction and repetition.. We experience the world through our senses, and these senses feed us the same patterns day after day. The repetition creates familiarity. Familiarity creates belief. Belief creates identity. Over time, the mind builds a stable model of reality based on what it has repeatedly seen, heard, and felt. This model becomes the foundation of our worldview.

Experts, leaders, and cultural authorities reinforce these models. They tell us what is true, what is normal, what is acceptable, and what is real. They shape the consensus that defines the boundaries of everyday life. When you agree with them, you fuse with the worldview they promote. You adopt it as part of your identity. You defend it as if it were your own flesh. You feel threatened when it is challenged. You feel validated when it is praised.

This fusion affects every part of daily reality. It determines how you interpret events. It shapes your emotional reactions. It influences your choices. It decides what you fear and what you desire. It tells you who you are and who you should be. It is the invisible force that keeps you aligned with the herd, even when the herd is running in circles. It is the reason you cling to familiar beliefs even when they no longer serve you. It is the reason you feel discomfort when someone suggests that the world might be larger, stranger, or more flexible than you were taught.

Identity fusion is not a flaw. It is a feature of human consciousness. But it is also a trap. When your identity becomes fused with a belief or a group, you stop seeing reality as it is and start seeing it as the group insists it must be. You stop perceiving the world directly and begin perceiving it through the filter of consensus. You become a spectator in your own life, convinced that you are a participant.

Reality Fusion and the Making of the Everyday Automaton

While identity fusion explains why people cling to groups, teams, and beliefs with such intensity, there is a deeper and far more pervasive mechanism at work. This same psychological gear binds humanity not only to social identities but to an entire model of reality itself. You could call this reality fusion, the moment when the individual merges with the sanctioned version of the world and begins to defend it as if it were their own flesh.

Reality fusion is the identity fusion of the entire species. It is the collective agreement about what is real, what is possible, and what must never be questioned. Just as the zealot sports fan will scream, cry, or even riot when their team loses, the average person will defend the accepted structure of reality with equal fervor. They may not overturn cars, but they will ridicule, shame, defund, or dismiss anyone who dares to look beyond the boundaries of consensus. They will protect the sanctioned worldview with the same instinct that a buffalo uses to protect the middle of the herd… see this article.

This happens because the basic model of reality is taught long before a person can think for themselves. The network that creates consensus begins immediately after birth. A parent points at objects and names them. They teach the child what is safe and what is dangerous, what is normal and what is strange, what is allowed and what is forbidden. They teach the child how to interpret sensations, how to categorize experiences, and how to act in the world. The child absorbs these lessons without question because they have no alternative frame of reference.

School reinforces this structure. Teachers present the world as a fixed system with clear rules and established truths. Peers enforce conformity through approval and rejection. Experts add authority to the entire structure by presenting themselves as custodians of reality. They tell you what exists, what does not exist, what is possible, and what is impossible. They shape the boundaries of perception and call it knowledge.

Over time, repetition turns perception into belief. Belief turns into identity. Identity turns into fusion. The individual becomes inseparable from the worldview they were taught. They no longer see reality as something they experience. They see it as something they are. Any challenge to the consensus feels like a personal attack. Any deviation feels like a threat. Any suggestion that reality might be larger or stranger than the sanctioned model feels like an insult to their very existence.

This is why the average person becomes a kind of drone. They are not mindless in the sense of lacking intelligence. They are mindless in the sense that their identity has fused so completely with the consensus that they cannot imagine stepping outside it. They defend the sanctioned reality because they believe they are defending themselves. They protect the worldview because they believe they are protecting their own essence. They cling to the herd because they believe the herd is who they are.

Reality fusion is the quiet force that keeps humanity aligned with a shared perception of the world. It is the reason people fear the unknown. It is the reason they resist new ideas. It is the reason they feel threatened by anything that challenges the consensus. It is the reason they stay in the middle of the herd even when the horizon is calling.

The Need to Grow Beyond the Fused Reality

It is true that identity fusion has its uses. It helps the individual function within the group. It creates harmony, predictability, and shared understanding. It gives the child a starting point, a simple surface level reality that allows them to act within the world without falling into chaos. But this surface level reality is only a beginning. It is not meant to be the final destination of a fully developed human being. There comes a time when the child must grow up and see beyond the fused world they inherited. There comes a time when the individual must expand.

This expansion is at the heart of every theological search for meaning. It is the reason people begin to question their routines. It is the reason they feel restless in the face of repetition. The structure of reality that once felt comforting begins to feel small. The identity they fused with begins to feel restrictive. The drone begins to sense that there is more to life than the sanctioned world they were taught to defend.

The average rationalist will insist that all there is, is within the sole realm of the physical senses. They will say that reality is limited to what the eyes can see and the ears can hear. But even within the physical senses there is a great beyond. The senses themselves have been shaped by identity fusion. They have been trained to perceive in a particular way. They have been taught to divide the world into objects and empty space, into things that matter and things that do not. This division is not natural. It is learned.

Take vision. The average person looks at the world and sees objects floating in empty space. They see a chair, a tree, a wall, and they ignore the space between them. They treat the space as nothing. They treat the objects as everything. This is not the only way to see. There are jungle tribes that do not understand depth in the way modern people do. They see the world as a flat curtain of shapes and colors. There are individuals who can invert the relationship between object and space. They can perceive the emptiness as full and the objects as interruptions in a continuous field. They can see the world as a single flowing structure rather than a collection of separate things.

The same is true for hearing. Most people listen for distinct sounds and ignore the silence between them. They treat silence as absence. But silence can be perceived as a presence. It can be felt as a texture. It can be experienced as a living part of reality. Touch, taste, and smell can also be expanded. There are sanctioned ways of perceiving and there are unsanctioned ways. The sanctioned ways create the fused reality. The unsanctioned ways reveal that even the physical senses contain hidden dimensions.

A deeper dive if you are interested… you can either read this section or keep reading past it if you are short for time. It is an enlightening deeper look into the processes I discuss in this article, and it is a good introduction to what I cover extensively in my book The Occult Experience. If you want me to expand on this, let me know and I will try to do a full article on it.

Sensory habits are built through the environments we inhabit. People raised in highly structured urban settings often rely heavily on linear perspective, organizing their vision around isolated items set against passive background voids. By contrast, traditional hunter gatherer communities frequently prioritize acoustic awareness and broad peripheral tracking to monitor dense forest canopies where physical horizons are blocked. Similarly, maritime societies often utilize an allocentric frame of reference, constantly computing their precise position relative to wind, swell, and stars rather than relying on ego centered directions. These varied cognitive frameworks prove that human physiology processes raw stimuli through cultural instruction, turning sensory intake into vastly different experiences of reality.

Human perception is deeply bound to cultural habits and physical environments, producing entirely different ways of experiencing reality and structuring thought.

General Scientific Studies
Anthropological and psychological research confirms that sensory interpretation is not uniform across humanity:

  • Depth Perception and Environment: Classic cross-cultural studies, notably documented by anthropologist Colin Turnbull during his work with the Mbuti pygmies of the Ituri Forest, demonstrated that individuals raised in dense tropical canopies lack the habitual exposure to long-distance vistas. When an Mbuti man named Kenge was taken to an open plain for the first time, he mistook distant buffalo for insects because he had never learned to visually scale down objects across vast empty horizons. Psychologists like Marshall Segall, Donald Campbell, and Melville Herskovits later formalized these findings in cross-cultural psychology, showing that susceptibility to certain visual illusions depends heavily on whether a person grows up in a “carpented” world full of rectangular walls and straight lines.
  • Spatial Frames of Reference: Seminal cognitive research by linguist Stephen Levinson and anthropologist John Haviland into the Guugu Yimithirr people, an Indigenous Australian community, revealed that human spatial processing varies drastically. Their research showed that perception can be anchored entirely to the earth rather than the human body.

Alternative Perceptual Realities
Different communities process sensory inputs through frameworks completely foreign to standard urban experiences:

  • Absolute Geocentric Tracking: Speakers of languages like Guugu Yimithirr do not use egocentric terms like left, right, in front of, or behind. Instead, every physical action is perceived through fixed cardinal directions. A person does not scratch their left arm; they scratch their southwest arm. They do not walk forward; they walk north-northwest.
  • Continuous Field Awareness: Forest dwelling groups who live under a thick overhead canopy develop heightened auditory and tactile sensitivity over long-range visual tracking. Space is perceived not as an empty container separating distinct objects, but as a dense, continuous medium of sounds, smells, and overlapping organic textures.

From Perception to Syntax and Worldviews
The way sensory data is parsed directly dictates grammar, which in terms shapes how an entire culture conceptualizes time, existence, and action.

When a language relies on absolute cardinal directions rather than relative body coordinates, the syntax forces speakers to maintain a constant, subconscious mental compass. You cannot speak the language without precisely knowing where north is at every second, whether you are outdoors, blindfolded, or deep inside a windowless building. Consequently, psychological experiments show that these speakers naturally organize time and memories geographically, tracking time not as a line moving from left to right across the body, but moving from east to west.

This creates a radically different worldview. While Western syntax often separates humans from objects by placing an actor at the center of a sentence acting upon an external thing, an environmentally anchored cognitive system places the individual as a tiny, coordinated node within a vast, unyielding cosmic grid. Reality is experienced not as a collection of movable possessions floating in an empty void, but as an unbroken, living structure where everything has an absolute, unchangeable place.

The modern world has for the most part not made the connection yet of how deeply this different syntax of the world can affect perception… reality itself.

We are the sum of our language; it is the structure that we use to repeat our worldview. When the syntax is different, everything changes!

When syntax shifts, the entire architecture shifts with it, altering how the self is distinguished from the world and how the sacred is conceptualized.

Through sustained focus across generations, these linguistic and perceptual divergences compound into distinct civilizational frameworks, shaping societies whose inhabitants operate within a fundamentally altered universe. Pushed to its ultimate evolutionary limit, this continuous feedback loop between language, perception, and environment can produce cultural lineages so profoundly distinct that they function as entirely separate iterations of humanity.

Read that last line again, slowly, because it is not merely a conclusion to this little boxed section. It is a window. And if you look long enough, you may notice that it opens onto a reality far larger, older, and stranger than anything we pretend to understand. In time, you may realize that it explains the alien, the occult, the Weird… and, with a kind of terrible elegance, it explains everything!

Consider the phenomenon where you notice a certain kind of car and then begin to see it everywhere. This is not magic. It is perception shifting. It is the mind tuning itself to a new pattern. Once the pattern is noticed, the world reorganizes itself around it. This can happen with anything. You can tune your perception to colors, shapes, movements, or even the space between objects. You can tune your perception to the background instead of the foreground. You can tune your perception to the subtle instead of the obvious. When you do this, the world changes.

There are people who perceive reality in ways that most would consider strange. They see patterns in empty space. They feel textures in silence. They sense depth where others see flatness. They experience the world as a continuous field rather than a collection of objects. They have stepped beyond the fused reality. They have expanded their senses within the limits of the physical world. They have discovered that even the ordinary world contains extraordinary possibilities.

Perceptual Expansion and the Power of Attention

Identity fusion convinces the average person that their way of perceiving the world must be defended at all costs. To question the routine structure of reality feels like a direct assault on the self. This is why people become drones who protect their worldview with remarkable intensity. They are not defending truth. They are defending the fused identity that tells them who they are. This is critical because once perception becomes identity, any challenge to perception becomes a threat to existence.

Yet perception can go far beyond this fused cage. The physical senses are not fixed instruments. They are shaped by training, repetition, and the sanctioned rules of the group. The eyes are taught to divide the world into solid forms and empty gaps. The ears are taught to separate sound from silence. The skin is taught to distinguish contact from non contact. These divisions are learned. They are not inherent. They are part of the identity fusion that creates the drone.

Beyond this cage there are other ways to perceive. Inner senses can be awakened.

AttentionThe focal mechanism that directs mental energy and alters the structure of everyday reality. is the key. When you focus on a certain kind of car, you begin to see it everywhere. The car was always there. Your attention was not. When attention shifts, reality shifts. This can be taken much further. You can focus on the background instead of the foreground. You can focus on the silence instead of the sound. You can focus on the space instead of the object. When you do this, the world changes. The senses reveal hidden layers. The drone begins to crack.

This expansion leads directly to the idea that reality itself is shaped by attention. When attention moves beyond the sanctioned limits of the physical senses, perception begins to stretch. It reaches into what inner alchemy calls cosmic distanceA vastness existing just beyond routine sensory perception where the familiar world thins.. This is not infinity. It is a kind of vastness that exists just beyond the edge of routine perception. It is the place where the familiar world begins to thin. It is the place where the cracks appear… it is the liminal spaces.

Imagine standing at the edge of your fused reality and seeing a small break in the structure. It is like an HP Lovecraft moment where the ordinary world reveals a slit of something immense behind it. The crack is small but the presence behind it is enormous. It is not darkness. It is not light. It is something that cannot be named because naming belongs to the fused world. It is the beyond, that the drone fears. It is the beyond that the seeker must face.

This is why perceptual expansion is both thrilling and terrifying. It shows that the world you defend so fiercely is only a surface. It shows that the senses you trust have been trained to see only a fraction of what is possible. It shows that attention is not just a tool but a force that shapes reality. When attention moves, reality moves. When attention expands, reality expands. When attention breaks the cage, the world becomes something far larger than the fused identity ever allowed.

The Collapse of Routine and the Birth of a New Perception

Cosmic expansion begins the moment the routine world starts to crack. Once attention shifts beyond the sanctioned limits of the physical senses, the familiar structure of reality begins to loosen. The drone feels the first tremor. The fused identity feels the first strain. The world that once seemed solid begins to show seams. These seams are the beginning of a new form of perception.

It is possible for an average person to reach this place. It is possible to see beyond the boundaries of perceptual routine. But this step is difficult because it requires rejecting identity fusion. It requires dismantling the idea of self that has been built since childhood. It requires breaking the self. EnlightenmentThe radical dissolution of the fused ego to allow expanded, direct perception of reality. in any tradition demands this destruction. The old self must fall so that a new and expanded self can rise. This is the key. You are destroying your self because identity fusion has convinced you that you are the thing you perceive. To attack the fused reality is to attack you. Therefore the self must be broken before a different reality can be revealed.

This is the secret that is rarely explained. People speak of awakening but they do not speak of the cost. They speak of expansion but they do not speak of the collapse required to make room for it. They speak of higher perception but they do not speak of the fear that comes when the familiar world begins to dissolve. When the fused identity breaks, the world loses its usual shape. The senses begin to stretch. Attention begins to move into places it has never been allowed to go. The routine world collapses and a new form of perception emerges.

This new perception is not abstract. It is not symbolic. It is not metaphor. It is a direct experience of reality beyond the cage of identity fusion. Inner senses begin to awaken. Attention begins to reach into distances that cannot be measured. Perception begins to extend into what inner alchemy calls cosmic distance. This is not infinity. It is a vastness that exists just beyond the edge of the familiar world. It is the place where the ordinary world thins and something immense begins to show through.

This is the emergence of a new form of perception. It is the moment when attention becomes a force that shapes reality. It is the moment when the senses begin to reveal layers that were always present but never noticed. It is the moment when the fused identity collapses and the world becomes larger than the cage ever allowed.

Recommended Reading

If you wish to explore these techniques in a slow and natural way, if you wish to understand how to break past certain physical barriers of perception in order to reach a greater reality, then I recommend this comprehensive guide.

The Occult Experience

There you will find a careful method for expanding perception, dismantling identity fusion, and creating a new reality that stretches far beyond the walls of the current cage. It is a path that can take the practitioner into cosmic distance, into the kind of awe and mystery that feels like standing at the edge of a Lovecraft crack in the world, looking into a vastness that has always been there, waiting for attention to finally turn toward it.

8 responses to “Reality Fusion, And The Hidden World Behind the Routine Self”

  1. Ali Ansari Avatar
    Ali Ansari

    I wonder what’s your opinion about identity fusion, in a more private sense. I mean, I’m not talking about being merged in a group identity. I’m talking about changing my identity by shifting my awareness to sense the reality from another’s perspective. Imagine falling sleep, and then waking up as another individual. A real individual who lives in this physical world.

    1. John Avatar
      John

      To me this, at least at first read, sounds like aberration.

  2. Rod Sorrell Avatar
    Rod Sorrell

    I downloaded the free sample of “Vampires Way” on a whim and was immediately hooked. I now have all your books. First time through them is like eating the icing on the cake. Now to undertake the real work (which is the most fun) of putting it all into practice.
    Thank you for opening doors to realms beyond the ordinary.

    1. John Avatar
      John

      Thank you so much for supporting my work, Rod. I truly appreciate you picking up my books. I only hope the “free” versions don’t become too widespread, because that would make it hard for me to continue writing. The small income from book sales is what allows me to keep creating this material. If that support ever drops too low, the project would have to stop. So your contribution means more than you know.

  3. D Avatar
    D

    Hi John,

    Since you asked, I’d be very interested to read a deeper breakdown of this perception topic.

    I might re-read the Occult Experience soon as well. For what it’s worth, I’ve bought I believe all of your books, excepting maybe one, and I’m very grateful for them.

    I confess that when my friend first recommended you three years ago, I read a free version of Overcoming the Archon Through Alchemy (I was strained financially). Since then I’ve purchased 8+ of your books. I think anyone who gets what you’re about on some level will also jump into supporting the work. I hope this is somehow comforting or encouraging (and doesn’t make me look like a cheap a–hole).

    Your line about the separate iterations of humanity is very potent and very well said. I agree it’s a window. As I read this, a family member of mine was sitting in the next room studying for the ACT. I listened to him talking through some of the math problems. I realized he’s going through a sort of indoctrination (not to say it’s not important).

    He’s internalizing the Newtonian world view more deeply. And I realized spontaneously that the Newtonian worldview (the world of Newtonian mechanics where straight lines “exist” and are all important) is an evolution/abstraction of the “carpented” world we currently live in.

    And the belief that there are separate objects is what’s underneath that (or is indistinguishable from it). I hope this makes some kind of sense, because I have a question about this iteration of humanity.

    In your mind, to what extent is the feedback loop between language, perception, and environment a specific expression of an imposed intent? I realize this is a clumsy wording.

    What I mean is that is it an agenda to get humanity to believe a certain way, to perceive in a specific way?

    Or is it an accident of the influence of the archon?

    Or is it that we (collectively) get/got caught in a tide of unconscious desire/value fulfillment?

    Or do surges of energy that are beyond all of this cause really weird s— to happen to humanity? And so our absolute belief (arrogance) about being on the cutting edge of evolution and having the absolute most useful and advanced technology to ever have existed (iPhones) is really just a way to protect ourselves from the horrors of the infinite? 😂

    I can’t tell if I’m joking or not, so I hope the real question is coming through.

    Thank you.

    1. John Avatar
      John

      Ha ha, whatever the case, All of this is extremely funny and I am deeply enjoying your wit:)

      Thank you very much D, I so deeply appreciate you getting my books and even more, I appreciate your honesty and kind words! I suppose that is why I can never be upset by let’s say, the “free” versions out there, because in the end it helps those that need it when they need it, and perhaps through all of it I can make more friends, like you. Thank you again!

      Your questions are wonderfully tough and hit right at the center of things, and while they are difficult to untangle, they are entirely fair and deeply important. My immediate intuition from reading your thoughts is that you already know many of the answers.

      To break this down, let us look at how time actually works. Time is not linear at all, even though our physical senses make us perceive it that way like a sluggish movie reel. If we pretend time is linear just for a bit of conversational convenience, early human existence relied heavily on a straightforward, step-by-step understanding of the world. For our early ancestors acting as predators, the causal structure and logic of basic Newtonian principles were massive evolutionary advantages.

      In physics, Newton’s laws represent first-order mechanical physics, dealing with absolute space, constant time, and direct cause-and-effect motion where every action has a predictable, mechanical reaction. This framework treats objects as entirely separate billiard balls bouncing off one another in straight lines, which fits right into the carpented human world you mentioned.

      That rigid mechanical mindset was essential at first because, let us face it, humanity is still basically a cosmic infant stumbling around in the dark. As our species progressed, this limited cognitive structure acted as a vital shield protecting us from the terrifying infinity that surrounds human consciousness on all sides. This shielding cannot be underestimated. While it produced a rather self-important, ego-driven creature that struggles to see beyond rigid boxes, it gave our infant species a stable footing to develop. Over time, earlier survival strategies and ways of interpreting reality (things that modern society now dismisses as mere superstitions, pseudoscience, or ye olde nonsense) were left behind as humanity leaned harder into regimented mechanical logic.

      Think of it like the bark on a tree trunk. The outer bark becomes hard, and that toughness protects the living wood from outside environmental threats, which is a good thing. But if a tree is not careful, that bark can grow so thick and rigid that it eventually chokes off the inner life of the tree. That protective outer layer was important at the dawn of human development because it provided a stable, coherent place from which to grow. Yet as our species eventually matures and learns better awareness over time, it must loosen that rigidity or risk being trapped forever.

      While humanity occasionally catches glimpses of reality beyond this box through fuzzy logic or by pushing quantum mechanics to its absolute limits, those deeper realities still seem to rattle most people.

      So, is this rigid setup an intentional design of the Archon? Yes, because the Archon’s mind is our mind, it actively hinders us at every turn, and our limited mind operates largely as an extension of that overarching trap. Is it just an accidental byproduct? To answer that, we have to ask how something can truly be an accident within the domain of chaos mathematics, where complex systems follow deep, hidden patterns rather than random luck. On top of that, humanity collectively got caught in a powerful tide, an ideological eddy that has kept us spinning in circles for far too long, even within recorded history… which is deeply faulty anyway, seeing as true human history stretches far beyond what classical mechanics could ever possibly comprehend… this time in the eddie has been too long for my liking.

      It is entirely true that “Brown Thunder” and other “royal deposits” of weirdness happen all around us right now, and perhaps it is a brilliant survival mechanism to act like an arrogant “noble nugget” just to shield yourself while you mindlessly doomscroll on your iPhone. Part of waking up to that weirdness requires escaping the rigid tree bark of conventional thinking. And if you get smart enough using classical mechanics properly, you eventually realize through its own causal structures that Occam’s razor cannot explain everything, proving there is an urgent need for complex systems.

      Understanding advanced logic and reason ultimately shows you that standard scientific limitations have massive blind spots, and those blind spots deserve to be studied because there is a staggering amount of reality existing far beyond the comfortable cocoon humanity built for itself. Getting other people to see this is notoriously difficult, though. Why is that? In inner alchemy we call that overarching hindrance the Archon, and a Gnostic might call it the demiurge.

      1. D Avatar
        D

        Thank you John. It really does mean a lot to have friends I can bounce these mad ideas off of.

        I think you should know, when I first read your line about “brown thunder,” I thought this was some strange esoteric concept I hadn’t heard of. I even tried googling it. (Turns out it’s the name of a mission in GTA Vice City.) Took me a few minutes to realize you were just going along with what I said about weird s— happening all the time. I thought brown thunder sounded quite cool and mysterious and was a phrase of the same order as something like “back rooms.” But no. Just a poop joke. 🤣

        I realize I was leading the witness somewhat with the questions I asked, but I’m glad you saw what I was trying to get at.

        I’ve been chewing on your response and I’ve had a couple ideas and questions emerge that are probably even more complicated to untangle (from a certain perspective) than the original questions.

        The first idea is related to what you said about quantum mechanics, advanced logic, and blind spots caused by the limits of how science is currently applied. Or maybe it’s that blind spots cause science to be applied in a limited way. Either way, I’m more of an artist than a scientist and I barely know what I’m talking about, but something occurred to me quite spontaneously this morning:

        Smart people, reasonably, refer to the double slit experiment anytime they talk about how our perception affects the world around us. And yet…

        When they do so, they’re talking about these findings of quantum mechanics from within a framework/world in which there are separate objects; the world where the individual ego is the center of everything (at least grammatically).

        I think the deeper mystery that seems to be hidden under these experimental findings (to me, and seemingly to many others) begins to unravel when it is recognized that the “observer” in these experiments is not a stable object. “Observer” is a placeholder for a convenient perceptive point, the one which we have chosen to build our world around.

        It seems to me like even quantum mechanics is currently defined by limitations more than underlying truth. It is an important and noble field because I think it’s an attempt to reconcile how inadequate the “ideological eddy” that defines this carpented epoch really is. (Again, this is defined by separate objects and straight lines.) Yet problems cannot be solved on the level on which they were created.

        Which brings me to the second idea and question. It is a bit odd maybe.

        Have you noticed how strange it is that we exist at all? 😂

        I think this is a simple question. It can also be thrilling and terrifying. The feeling this question brings seems important. But integrating it logically with the conscious self is…tricky.

        Because on some level the question arises from the same place as people’s conclusions about quantum mechanics.

        It’s all a trick.

        In writing this, I have just found a more precise version of the question I was trying to ask last week about the archon.

        You talked about how the ego driven identities humans developed were, or are, important because of the shelter and structure they provide.

        This aligns with how the very small group of Jungian scholars interested in inner alchemy talk about the importance of the ego in the context of the great work, or individuation. There’s a book called Jung and the Alchemical Imagination where Jeff Raff talks about the importance of the ego being strong enough to withstand the initial onslaught of the unconscious. I think some would say this is the entire point of Jung’s approach to therapy.

        Raff’s book is heavy on symbol and theory, and light on effective technique, but it does frame the real question I want to ask about the archon and about “accidents”:

        Let’s say I buy the classical alchemical story about the great work and becoming a true individual. Then our present circumstances with respect to the archon are, fundamentally, an opportunity.

        The archon is undoubtedly a predator. But can it not be helpful to relate to it as a teacher, a helper, perhaps even a meddling kid? Does it on some level support the true task of the alchemist?

        What I meant by accident before was really this: is our current ego orientation an emergent property that was opportunistically reinforced or contrived by the archon, or is it the entire point of this strange little reality that we exist in currently?

        I suppose these are not mutually exclusive, and it could be something else entirely. I’m hitting the limits of my words and getting a little dogmatic. Whoops.

        Thanks John.

        Hope you enjoy this lighthearted Sunday discourse. Ha!

        1. John Avatar
          John

          Sorry for taking you on a flapdoodle ferry ride, as they used to say far too long ago. Sometimes the little joker inside me slips out of his cage, and once he is loose it can be difficult to coax him back in. I will endeavor to be more serious in this reply. And yes, flapdoodle ferry ride is not an esoteric term or a sinister methodology that I have been hiding from you.

          I must say, for someone who calls himself more of an artist, you have touched on one of the most difficult aspects of quantum mechanics. You are absolutely right that the observer in these experiments is not a stable object. The observer is in as much fluctuation as the phenomena being observed. This point alone is enough to give Heisenberg nightmares, and poor Schrödinger’s cat would probably prefer to stay in the box rather than deal with the philosophical implications of being both alive and dead. A rational person might be tempted to open the box to settle the matter, but not everyone is that rational. Some might prefer to toss the entire box into a deep pond and let the world remain in flux.

          This is the real problem. We are not rational animals. Rationality is a theology we perform. We pretend that the observer is a fixed point, a stable reference, a little lighthouse in the storm. But the observer is a wave. The observer is a fluctuation. The observer is a temporary eddy in a much larger current. This is why quantum mechanics is so difficult to prove in the classical sense. The very act of observation alters the system, and the system alters the observer. The collapse of the wave is not a simple mechanical event. It is a mutual transformation. Until the rationalistic theology that insists on stable objects and straight lines is overcome, quantum mechanics will continue to reveal mysteries that cannot be resolved within the current conceptual frame.

          As for the question of why we exist at all, I tried to answer some of this in my book The Way of the Death Defier. If you have not read it, I recommend it. It may be a good light Sunday read for you, and it might inspire another round of discourse on this fine day.

          Your ideas about the Archon are important. I also explore them in the book I mentioned above. From the point of view of inner alchemy, the ego is an emergent field created by the Archon. But as you rightly point out, this is not entirely negative. Inner alchemists consider the ego a gift, and certainly something worth stealing. The Archon can indeed be a teacher. In certain old theologies it is quite literally God. There is much to unpack there.

          From the inner alchemist’s perspective, the ego is the first ring of power. It is the structure that allows us to withstand what Jungian scholars might call the unconscious, but what is in reality the Infinity that surrounds us. We can call it the unconscious for convenience, and I do so myself, but the truth is that what exists beyond the ego is far larger than any psychological model. It is the second ring of power, and it extends into places unknown and most importantly unknowable.

          You can think of the ego as the first layer, the first ring, and it must be ordered. The methodologies for this ordering are presented in the trilogy of books, where The Way of the Death Defier is the third. In the second book, The Way of the Projectionist, I go into the logos, the ordering principle of the ego. There is far more to this than can be easily digested on even a lovely Sunday afternoon, but your intuition is correct. The Archon is both predator and teacher. The ego is both shelter and challenge. And our present circumstances are indeed an opportunity for those who seek the great work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

How psychic are you? Free quiz!

Support the Site. Buy a Novel!

Cool. Fun! Prophetic?

Happy Days book cover.

Imagine a world where 80% of the human population suddenly goes insane.

How and why does this happen? How do you dose…infect…most of the world?

Does the author know something, knew something, in 2015? Is this a potential future?

But who cares about all that. What’s important is that for a certain kind of lunatic, these are Happy Days!