Self-Improvement and Interesting Knowledge

In my last article, I introduced a particular philosophical perspective that I referred to as the mad logician. This perspective is far more than just a way of thinking; at its deepest level, it is a technique. It is a practice that not only fosters the blossoming of perception and awareness, but also serves as a powerful means for the absorption and containment of energy. This is a central tenet of inner alchemy, the way of being and action that I follow.
Recently, a thoughtful reader posed a profound question having to do with this article:


“…reading your article about debating and discussing with others, I still mostly struggle with my role in other people’s lives. I don’t mean this in a way of self importance. Rather if somebody has chosen (unconsciously at least in this realm) a way in the illusion, is there a point in trying to talk about this illusion in the first place? Where does impeccability start/end when another person is involved? I am usually much more quiet in discussions now compared to how I used to be years ago (which is good in a sense that there are less arguments). Having said this, I still struggle to not be completely honest at the same time. Honest not in a way that I think I know better. Honest more in a way that I would bring another angle to a conversation/discussion. Unfortunately, this perspective usually gets people very angry. I’m wondering, how do you interpret this question with people that are more or less close to you?”


This is a great question that strikes at the very core of philosophy, communication, and personal growth. But it’s important to recognize that simple answers are never the right ones. We live in an infinitely complex, chaotic world. A world that, unlike a chessboard with its fixed pieces and rigid rules, is never fully contained or predictable. Reality is always capable of introducing new parameters and possibilities that exist outside any conceptual “board.” There are no final answers, no easy solutions, no static dogmas; only the ever-shifting flow of possibility. Let’s explore this together.

The Key Tenet of the Mad Logician

A key tenet of being a mad logician is the deep understanding that you cannot know what is around the corner. You cannot see the big picture, not truly, because of the immense limitations of the physical senses. As I wrote in my last article, The Way of the Mad Logician, with your eyes you can only see so far, with your ears you can only hear so much. In this way, we all, in a sense, live in a box: a cube, a little prison of our own senses.


The mad logician begins with an honest acknowledgement: most of what we experience is shaped not only by the narrow limits of our senses, but also by the vast web of inference and dogma we rely on just to function in everyday life.
Since our physical senses can’t reveal what lies beyond our immediate perception, we’re forced to infer, to remember, and, crucially, to accept as truth what others, especially authority figures, tell us. This is what I mean by dogma: the borrowed truths we adopt simply to exist within our inherently limited perceptual world.


This is not an ideal circumstance. The mad logician, seeing this, rejects this way of being. They turn themselves into something different; someone who realizes that their world is small, that even when they turn around, they don’t truly know what is behind them and must rely on memory. Yet, memory is always suspect, because memory is so malleable and unreliable.


Beyond this, the mad logician understands that there is only one true moment: the present moment of present awareness. Anything before or after that present moment is an inference, a memory, or perhaps even dogma. In this way, the mad logician is, by the world’s standards, mad. But this also makes them unique. Everyone else is sane: they live and stay sane through inference, memory, and especially dogma, which they must trust with every ounce of their being, because anything else would bring about incredible instability and fear.

The Mad Logician Stands Outside the World, And In Doing So Acquires Power

What I didn’t discuss in the article mentioned is that this form of living (truly embodying the way of the mad logician) not only opens up awareness to the incredible variety of existence and possibilities that are out there, but that this way of being also allows the mad logician to acquire energy, power. And it is through the acquisition of this power that the mad logician has any way of dealing with the “sanity” of the world.


For the mad logician, there is magic around every corner! By understanding their limitations, they also come to understand that the world is, at its core, a truly magical place. All those things that people say “are what they are” are only so, because people are willing to believe, to accept dogma, to accept the rationality of their times. This rationality is itself a kind of dogma: a set of rules that only allows for very particular causal possibilities. Anything that falls outside these parameters is quickly labeled as insanity. For them, the world is a bland place, full of expected possibilities, rational possibilities. For the mad logician, the world is an infinite mystery.


So, the mad logician stands outside of the world, beyond dogma, beyond the rationality of the times, to truly become insane by conventional standards. But in following this way, in breaking free from the egoistic need to shape the world according to the rules set by the dogma-creators (the rulers of consensus reality), the mad logician becomes free. Incredibly free.


And it is in this freedom that the mad logician accumulates energy. This energy is not just a metaphor, but a real force that allows for perceptions beyond the physical senses. In particular, it leads to the development of what I call the inner senses, which are ways of perceiving that are far more robust than the outer, physical ones. With these heightened senses, this expanded awareness, the mad logician begins to unravel the mysteries of the world, “seeing” what lies hidden behind the veil of ordinary perception.

Hard Questions…Perhaps Beyond Rational Answers

Through these heightened perceptions, the mad logician begins to see beyond the veil. Beyond dogma, beyond the simulation or the matrix that has captured the average world. At first, these perceptions may be subtle. They might start as a faint awareness of the dogma that saturates daily life, the invisible controls that lead so many into endless folly. Yet even the slightest empowerment opens the mad logician to the many traps that exist in the world.


One of the most persistent of these traps is the trap of the ego. The ego demands that you prove yourself right to others, or, from the deepest corners of your heart, urges you to help your loved ones see the folly that surrounds us all. These are ‘natural’ inclinations, and they are not without their virtues in accordance with the dogma of the times. The desire to be right in the midst of folly is, in many ways, a herd instinct: a mechanism that, over time, can help the group find a better path. The rebel, by challenging the status quo, can become a leader or at least a catalyst, helping others in the herd or the pack to find a more survivable, more comfortable way across the reality of existence…at least this is what the dogmatic rationality of the times says.


Similarly, the urge to help loved ones and family is a noble one. It springs from compassion, from the wish to ease the suffering caused by folly and illusion. But at such moments, it is vital to pause and ask:
• Am I speaking to serve my own ego, or am I genuinely offering a new perspective?
• Does the other person truly seek a new angle, or are they content with their current view?
• Is my honesty truly a form of help, or is it a subtle expression of superiority?


These are not easy questions. Often, our hearts get in the way, clouding our vision with emotion and attachment. The mad logician, in these moments, must listen to the heart, because the heart, too, is a perception of the present moment. But they must also strive to go beyond mere inference and dogma, which might insist that this is what must be done simply because it is what the “sane” do.


In this way, the mad logician walks a delicate path, balancing the call of the heart with the awareness that true impeccability lies not in following the rules of the herd, but in acting with clarity, humility, and conscious intent.

Flow vs. Obstruction

As such, the mad logician must always return to their foundation; a foundation rooted in the humble recognition that they do not truly know anything. The most that can be known is that one is equal to everything, and nothing more. To think that your way is superior, or even to believe that the way of the mad logician is superior, is itself folly. It is the same folly that arises when the dogma of the times insists the ego must act in a particular way, in accordance with the policies, the political correctness, or the so-called “right thing to do” of the era.


Being a mad logician myself, I cannot tell you what you should do. I cannot say whether you are meant to follow the herd and try to help your pack, nor can I tell you if you should point out the folly of others. My “seeing”, which is my perception using my inner senses, here and now as I write this, tells me only that I, this particular mad logician, must follow the energy flow of the moment.


This means that if certain individuals, who hold opinions different from my own, are flowing in a particular direction (if their intent and their beliefs are moving along a certain path), then perhaps the wisest course is to let that direction flow. To stand in front of that flow is to create obstruction, and for me, that way is not always preferable.


And yet, there are moments when standing against the flow is exhilarating, even necessary. Every individual, every potential mad logician, must ultimately follow their own way, guided by their perceptions in that present moment. There is no universal answer, only the clarity that comes from seeing, sensing, and acting impeccably in the now.

An Alone, But Never Lonely Bird

As such, as you can see, I have no answers; at least not in the conventional sense. Instead, what I offer is a way. If you choose, you can try this for yourself: become the mad logician now, and continue relentlessly on that path.


What I can say (what I see as an energetic truth, a current that persists and can be perceived even now) is that if the way of the mad logician is followed, in time you will accumulate energy. Through this accumulation, new perceptions will open up. There will be a more direct connection between you and those inner senses; senses that are far more accurate than anything purely physical. This connection, this connection to the flow of energy, can become so keen, so refined, that at some point the mad logician will know what to do at every present point in their own reality.

There is no universal answer to your question. Each moment calls for its own response, born of awareness and inner strength. In this way, our role in others’ lives becomes not one of correction, but of presence: a living example of the freedom that comes from seeing through the illusion, and the wisdom to know when to speak and when to listen. These are my perceptions in accordance with my seeing, I encourage you to find your own answers.

Because, after all, another energetic fact (one that I see clearly in this moment) is that we are all, whether we like it or not, on an individual and solitary journey.


The way of the mad logician is not about having answers for others, but about refining your own perception, your own impeccability, and your own freedom. It is about learning to sense and follow the subtle flows and currents of energy within reality and within people. These are skills and insights I have explored in depth in my book, Overcoming the Archon Through Alchemy. In that work, I detail practical methods for attuning to these energetic currents and moving through the world with greater awareness and mastery. By learning to follow the flow of energy just right, as described in the book, you begin to step beyond dogma and external authority. In this way, you become your own authority, guided by the energy and awareness of the present moment.


9 comments

  1. Ali Ansari

    Thank you for sharing this great article.

    Interfering with others’ paths can be interpreted as deviating from one’s own path—an egoistic deviation, or as you mentioned in your article, an egoistic trap. A question that comes to my mind is: why can’t an egoistic deviation from the flow of energy in the present moment be considered one’s own path? I mean, if I’m aware that I’m acting based on ego, then why should I avoid such action? Perhaps my personal value fulfillment lies in that egoistic direction.

    I often wonder why being egoistic is looked down upon by so many. We cannot do anything that is not egoistic. Even transcending the ego is, in itself, a type of egoistic desire or achievement. I think one of the methods for developing inner senses—those capable of perceiving realities beyond our physical senses—is to invert the ego. Not by changing our actions in the physical world, but by changing how we perceive our own actions.

    It’s like creating resistance against a kind of sensory input that isn’t detectable by physical senses. And that’s not possible unless we acknowledge the ego and see it for what it is. From my perspective, the ego is a powerful tool—one that can be harnessed if we approach it without judgment.

    I differentiate between egoistic desires based on how they affect the world. An egoistic desire for creating a sense of superiority can actually be a good thing—if that sense of superiority fulfills part of my personal desires and (potentially) helps others fulfill theirs, through sharing what I’ve discovered via my inner senses. In fact, this is how I define an inner sense. I cannot access or use these inner senses by merely following the energy of the present moment and sticking to my path without interfering with others’.

    To me, inner senses are an inversion of the ego—and they couldn’t exist without the ego. Often, using these senses requires deviation from what is considered impeccable action from an energetic point of view. Yet these deviations lead me to vast reservoirs of energy I had no access to before.

    If we place energy and personal power at the center of our attention, two pathways emerge: short-term and long-term. The short-term path tells us to act impeccably—to conserve our energy and avoid interfering with others. The long-term path is more chaotic, less impeccable. It may lead me into situations that deplete me, where my presence seems irrational. Avoiding such situations is both sane and insane—sane from the view of a mad logician, insane from the view of an even madder one.

    Although this fosters my inner senses, I don’t see it as an energetic investment. The fruits of such choices are side effects, not the main purpose.

    1. An interesting and well thought out comment. And I must point out that I did write that there are times when standing against the flow is exhilarating, sometimes even mandatory.
      Part of being the mad logician is being humble enough to understand that there is more out there than you could ever perceive, even with the inner senses. So your path is your own and I commend you for understanding it so well. For me, short-term and long-term are merely controlled folly…now. Above around beneath and through the very core of me, there develops, and continues to develop only one possible reality, a spacious present.

  2. Hi John, thanks so much for this article. You cannot imagine how empowering it is to be reminded that we hold the key ourselves. We just seem to keep forgetting this simple fact (which might be part of the programming in this matrix or illusion). I like to look at my life as a training ground and after reading your article it felt like having had a great training session. But there is a bitter side to it too. Even though I agree with your take about the individual and solitary journey, I think it is a coach or at least a sparring partner in this Dojo called “concious living” that I miss (and I mean this from my heart, not from my ego). I’ve asked myself the (three) questions above many times. Before, during and after a conversation that was predestined to lead to nowhere from the start. At the same time I think I usually took (and still take) a shot to find out what the other person is all about. Because who knows, maybe I eventually bump into another mad logician that has been under cover for quite some time.
    In the way of a Toltec warrior, which seems to be close to the one of an Alchemist, they say some things cannot be acquired by reading, trying or practicing. According to their teachings, some things need to be instructed by a teacher or benefactor (like they call these “persons of knowledge”). Did you ever have such a benefactor yourself? Because in my perception your books, articles and answers are so crystal clear, without even the slightest contradiction, I ask myself how you got to this point of apparent mastery. All alone?

    1. Well, I like your idea; who knows, maybe eventually you may bump into another mad logician. I also love your courage for taking a chance.

      As to my past, well, I believe those Toltec warriors also practice the notion of no personal history, being that such history tends to hold one down. It is the gravity, the part that makes us forget (like you say part of the programming of the matrix) that they are trying to overcome. So the lighter they are, the better.
      But I must admit, that throughout my books I have thrown out bits here and there. About practicing and getting to certain points (like I do in the magnum opus trilogy for example) and of course there’s that crazy little book, the art of transmutation. It’s all a kind of night circus out there. C’est un cirque de rêves.

  3. Very helpful advice indeed, thank you as always! I am also remembering something you wrote, I think it was in one of your books but I can’t exactly remember, but it feels relevant to this topic. You said something to the effect of … that people don’t like being told what to do, and will generally not change their behavior or ways based on you giving them advice, but that they instead prefer to model their behavior off of people and so tend to change their behavior when they see something different that they like and want to be like.

    So you said (paraphrasing), instead of giving advice to others, the best or perhaps more effective thing that we can often do for them is to exhibit the behavior we would like them to have and if they are receptive to it they will see how we act and choose to learn by our example rather than our often poorly received advice.

    Don’t get me wrong, I want to tell people they are doing things wrong (It doesn’t mean I do, but I want to) and that my way is better all the time still! 😂 I have not yet evolved to full cool and reserved mad logician status. But you made such a good point that we can get to a place in our development where the decision to act or not act in every unique situation becomes clear, and we can choose what to do on a case by case basis. And I think that is so key in how to handle this often very challenging issue.

    And I love that you have provided the tools to help us get to the point where we can be able to receive this level of guidance and knowing. Particularly I now think in terms of cui bono (who benefits) from this increased emotional output from me being upset about something (like people having different opinions or not taking my advice) and how can I make sure I’m not draining my energy by getting caught up in anything? I don’t even need to know who benefits per se, just that someone or something is or would be, and with your tools I’m able to shut it down etc. It often feels like an Archonic setup to get people divided and arguing without end, but sometimes there are openings to act.

  4. The interrelationship of all these elements is a tough thing to manage I find. My security in life currently is tangled up in a relationship in which these dynamics keeps playing out in cycles. Even though I have observed the perceptions necessary to spark the desire and need to stop trying to change the people I care about, the way my life is woven with theirs, means that impacts on my life that are undesirable occur due to the fact that I am not putting myself in front of their currents and flows. Maybe this reveals being in a relationship not suitable to my personal path, but due to my choices thus far in life, ending the relationship would put me back to the same place I was at 18, not an easy thing to face amidst current conditions in Canada. I have no choice but to find peace and stability where I am if it is possible while letting those I care about follow their own path, or initiate a “start-over” that scares the crap out of me. I set myself up to be in this position so I suppose I have to buck up and figure this out and move on.

    1. if change is not possible, then detachment is critical. To that end practice the art of energetic containment, and also energy absorption. If others won’t stop their cascade of energy upon you, then thrive from that energy.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.