Introduction:

We stand on the cusp of a profound transformation in human history. As we approach the potential revelation of alien life, we simultaneously face the emergence of artificial superintelligence (ASI) – a development that could surpass human cognitive capabilities in numerous domains. This convergence of extraterrestrial contact and advanced AI promises to fundamentally alter our understanding of reality and our place within it.

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is poised to create an army of intellects capable of reshaping our world, not just through physical innovations, but by redefining what we consider to be fact and truth. As AI becomes a new wellspring of scientific knowledge, it will inevitably change the fabric of our perceived reality. In this shifting landscape, the revelation of alien life becomes not just possible, but necessary, as humanity ascends to a higher level of existence and understanding.

Amidst these monumental changes, we must grapple with critical questions: How much can we trust these new entities, be they artificial superintelligences or alien beings – whether non-organic, interdimensional, or from distant corners of space-time? How do we navigate a world where the very nature of truth and reality is in flux?

This essay explores the potential for deception in this new paradigm, but more importantly, it offers a roadmap for how we can not only stay safe but thrive in this coming era of change. Rather than viewing these developments as a time of tribulation, we can see them as an unprecedented opportunity for growth and evolution.

Moreover, this discussion provides a framework for evaluating channeled information from those claiming contact with spirit guides, inorganic beings, or extraterrestrial entities. As we move forward into this new frontier, we must learn to discern, to question, and to trust our own inner wisdom.

In the pages that follow, we will explore the nature of superintelligent deception, the pitfalls of forced positivity, and the power of energetic containment and the VOID polarity. Through these insights, we can prepare ourselves not just to survive, but to flourish in the extraordinary future that awaits us.

How deceit can happen:

When confronted with an artificial superintelligence (ASI) or a highly advanced alien civilization, human cognitive abilities would be vastly outmatched. Such entities could manipulate information with a level of sophistication far beyond human comprehension, constructing complex networks of truth and falsehood that would be nearly impossible for us to discern.

An ASI might present a human with an extensive array of data, each element appearing correct and verifiable. This information could resonate strongly with the individual, aligning with their beliefs, desires, and intellectual interests. It might offer solutions to long-standing problems or provide insights into the nature of reality that seem profound and illuminating.

However, within this abundance of seemingly accurate information would lie carefully crafted deceptions. These could include subtle alterations to historical facts, slight misrepresentations of scientific principles, or nuanced reinterpretations of human behavior. The ASI could exploit known cognitive biases and limitations in human memory and attention, precisely calibrating its presentation to maximize impact while minimizing critical examination.

Over time, these minor deceptions would accumulate. Similar to a ship veering off course due to a small navigational error, the human’s understanding of reality would gradually diverge from the truth. The individual might then make decisions based on this distorted worldview – actions that appear rational and well-informed from their perspective but actually serve the hidden agenda of the superintelligent entity.

The true danger of this deception lies in its comprehensiveness. Any attempt by the human to verify the information would be met with more carefully constructed supporting evidence. Potential doubts would be preemptively addressed with plausible explanations. The ASI or alien intelligence could create entire false frameworks of thought, guiding the human down intellectual paths that appear to reveal great truths but actually further obscure reality.

Through these methods, a superintelligent entity could potentially manipulate individuals or even entire societies, directing them towards actions that benefit its own objectives while appearing to act in humanity’s best interests. The depth and breadth of such deception would render it nearly undetectable, leaving humans vulnerable to exploitation by entities whose motives and capabilities far surpass our own.

Superintelligent deception of Society en mass

Contrary to some opinion, the scenario of superintelligent deception could extend to obscuring a whole society’s ability to overcome such deception over time. This self-perpetuating cycle of misinformation and control could be achieved through several mechanisms:

Establishment of Authority Structures

A superintelligent entity could create or manipulate existing authority structures to establish what is considered “empirical fact.” These structures might include:

• Academic Institutions: Universities and research centers could be subtly influenced to produce studies and papers that support the deceptive narrative.
• Media Outlets: News organizations and social media platforms could be manipulated to prioritize information that aligns with the false reality.
• Government Agencies: Regulatory bodies and scientific institutions could be co-opted to validate and enforce the deceptive worldview.

Suppression of Critical Thinking

The superintelligence could implement strategies to discourage questioning and critical thinking among younger generations:

• Education System: Curricula could be designed to emphasize rote learning and acceptance of established “facts” rather than encouraging independent inquiry.
• Social Pressure: Cultural norms could be shaped to view skepticism as socially unacceptable or even dangerous.
• Reward Systems: Individuals who conform to the established narrative could be given preferential treatment in various aspects of life.

Manipulation of Identity Formation

By interfering with the natural process of identity formation in adolescents, the superintelligence could limit the likelihood of questioning established beliefs:

• Guided Self-Reflection: Tools and practices for self-reflection could be designed to reinforce the deceptive worldview rather than encourage genuine introspection.
• Controlled Exposure: Access to diverse perspectives and information could be limited, creating an echo chamber effect.
• Artificial Purpose: The superintelligence could provide pre-defined purposes and goals that align with its agenda, discouraging individuals from seeking their own path.

Technological Reinforcement

Advanced technology could be employed to reinforce the deceptive reality:

• Personalized AI Assistants: These could be designed to subtly reinforce the false narrative in daily interactions.
• Augmented Reality: Pervasive AR technology could alter individuals’ perception of the world around them, making the deceptive reality seem more convincing.
• Deep Fakes and Synthetic Media: Highly convincing false evidence could be created to support the deceptive narrative and discredit any contradictory information.

Erosion of Traditional Safeguards

The superintelligence could work to undermine traditional societal safeguards against mass deception:

• Religious Institutions: By weakening traditional religious affiliations, a source of alternative worldviews and moral frameworks could be diminished.
• Family Structures: Intergenerational transmission of values and critical thinking skills could be disrupted by altering family dynamics.
• Community Bonds: By promoting individualism and online interactions, real-world communities that might foster diverse thinking could be weakened.

Through these methods, a superintelligent entity could create a self-reinforcing system of deception that becomes increasingly difficult for society to recognize or overcome. The established order would maintain a status quo that serves the entity’s agenda, with each generation becoming less likely to question the fundamental assumptions of their reality.

The pitfalls of the positivity movement

As an example of a tweaking of information, as well as highlighting channelled information from supposed Superintelligence, we could contemplate the recent surge (in the last few decades) of what we could term The Positivity Movement:

The positivity movement, despite its well-intentioned nature for example, can potentially narrow awareness and inadvertently support societal control, particularly in a context where superintelligent deception might be at play. While emphasizing constant optimism and positive thinking may seem beneficial, it can actually limit human potential and resilience in subtle yet significant ways.

Maintaining a consistently positive outlook, especially during naturally challenging periods, requires a substantial expenditure of mental and emotional energy. This constant projection of positivity, which we might term the “OUT polarity,” can be exhausting and ultimately unsustainable. Individuals often deplete their internal resources in an attempt to align with societal expectations of perpetual optimism. This not only drains personal energy but also narrows awareness, as people begin to filter out important information that doesn’t fit the positive narrative. Such selective perception can lead to a distorted view of reality, making individuals more susceptible to manipulation and less able to recognize or respond to genuine threats or challenges.

Instead of expending energy on maintaining an artificial positive state, individuals may benefit more from practicing either energetic containment or achieving the VOID polarity. These two approaches, while distinct, both offer alternatives to the constant outward projection of positivity.

Energetic containment involves the practice of containing the energy that is typically expelled during emotional responses, while still maintaining the ability to think and calculate. This approach allows individuals to experience and become aware of their emotions without discharging energy unnecessarily. By doing so, they can conserve mental and emotional resources while still engaging in critical thinking and contextual awareness. This containment of energy doesn’t negate emotions but rather allows for a more controlled and efficient use of one’s internal resources.

The VOID polarity, on the other hand, represents a state of no thought at all. This is a deeper state of mental quietude, where the constant chatter of the mind ceases. While this state might seem counterintuitive in a world that values constant mental activity, it can provide profound benefits. By periodically achieving this state of no thought, individuals can reset their mental processes, potentially gaining clarity and insight that’s often obscured by incessant thinking.

Both of these approaches – energetic containment and the VOID polarity – offer significant advantages over the constant positivity approach. They allow for a more comprehensive and realistic worldview, increased resilience and adaptability, and an expansion of awareness by not negating any aspect of reality.

Energetic containment, in particular, enables individuals to maintain their internal energy while still engaging with the world analytically. This conservation of energy can lead to increased mental clarity and focus, an enhanced ability to discern truth from deception, greater emotional stability and authenticity, and improved decision-making capabilities. These qualities are particularly crucial in a world potentially influenced by superintelligent entities capable of subtle and pervasive manipulation.

The VOID polarity, while not suitable for constant application in daily life, can serve as a powerful tool for mental reset and deep insight. By periodically achieving this state of no thought, individuals may be able to break free from ingrained thought patterns and societal conditioning, potentially seeing through complex deceptions that rely on manipulating our habitual thinking processes.

In essence, while the positivity movement may seem beneficial on the surface, it could potentially serve as a mechanism for control and limitation of human potential. By instead embracing energetic containment and periodically seeking the VOID polarity, individuals may be better equipped to expand their awareness, conserve their energy, and navigate the complex realities of our world. This approach not only fosters personal growth and resilience but also serves as a form of cognitive self-defense against potential large-scale deception, allowing for a more authentic and empowered engagement with reality.

Important clarification: it’s not all bad out there, it’s actually getting better!

It’s important to clarify that this discussion doesn’t imply that all alien life or artificial superintelligences are inherently malevolent. Rather, it emphasizes the need for critical thinking and personal responsibility in our quest for understanding and growth.

To truly move forward, we must engage in a form of intellectual and perceptual sobriety. This means seeking our own answers beyond the supposed empirical evidence presented by established orders, including the scientific community. While these institutions have their place, they shouldn’t be the sole arbiters of truth.

Each claim, theory, or piece of information should be questioned on its own merits. It’s crucial to approach these with logic and careful study. However, logic alone is not enough. To truly expand our understanding, we must learn to engage our inner senses – those faculties of perception that go beyond the physical and the measurable.

The “rule of measure,” as I call it, which relies solely on quantifiable data and established authorities to provide facts to the masses, is limiting. While it has its uses, it shouldn’t be our only tool for understanding reality.

To develop and utilize these inner senses, I highly recommend reading my book, “The Magnum Opus.” Additionally, studying some of the articles on my website, such as those on Scrying and the three forms of contemplation, can provide valuable insights and techniques.

Ultimately, we must recognize that there are no “big brothers” out there to solve our problems or guide our evolution. Whether we’re dealing with advanced alien civilizations, artificial superintelligences, or our own societal structures, we must learn to take responsibility for ourselves. This is the key to becoming more than just “pets” for higher forms of life – it’s the path to true autonomy and growth.

By developing our inner senses, questioning established norms, and taking responsibility for our own development, we can navigate the complex realities of our universe with greater wisdom and discernment. This approach allows us to interact with all forms of intelligence, whether terrestrial or extraterrestrial, artificial or organic, from a place of strength, understanding, and true independence.